Gary's profileConstitution Party News ...PhotosBlog Tools Help

Blog


    December 13

    Constitution Party Update 12/12/2008

    Portions of This Weekend's
    Constitution Party National Meeting
    in Orlando, Florida
    To Be "Live Streamed"
    On The Internet!


    CLICK HERE:    www.republicmedia.tv

     

    Friday December 12

     

    7:00pm: Constitution Party National Committee Banquet

    Keynote Speaker: Chuck Baldwin,
    Constitution Party 2008 Presidential Candidate
     

    Saturday, December 13

     
    9:30am     Darrell Castle
    CP Vice-Chairman and 2008 Vice-Presidential Nominee
     
    10:05am    Congressman John Hostettler
    U.S. Congressman, (R-IN), 1995 – 2007
     
    10:45am         Howard Phillips
    CP Founder and Presidential Nominee in 1992, 1996 & 2000 "State of the Union"
     
    (All times are Eastern)
     

     

    November 23

    Constitution Party Newsletter

     
    Former Congressman
    John Hostettler, Of Indiana,
    To Attend And Address
    Constitution Party National
    Committee Meeting in Orlando!
     
     
     
     
    Former United States Congressman John Hostettler, of Indiana, will be in attendance at the National Committee meeting of the Constitution Party December 12-13 in Orlando, Florida and has accepted an invitation to speak at the meeting.  Hostettler spent 12 years as a member the United States House of Representatives from Indiana's 8th District in southwestern Indiana.  He served on the House Commttee on Agriculture (1995-2001); the House Committee on Armed Services (1995-2007); and the House Committee on the Judiciary (2001-2007).House Committee on 1995-2001)
    House Committee1995-2007)
    The former Republican Congressman supported Chuck Baldwin for President in the 2008 election because he believes the "GOP has lost its way on conservative principles."  The subject of his address at the Orlando meeting will be "the fate of 'conservatism' in light of the elections of 2006 and 2008."  Constitution Party National Chairman, Jim Clymer, said that former Representative Hostettler's participation at the Constitution Party's National Committee meeting is "exciting news," noting that he had  "followed John Hostettler's career for years and have greatly admired the principled stands he took while a Representative in Congress.  We are happy to welcome former Representative Hostettler to our  National Committee meeting and look very much forward to meeting with him and and having him speak to our National Committee and other guests who will be in attendance."
     
    Mr. Hostettler is the author of a new book about the Iraq War entitled Nothing for the Nation: Who Got What Out of Iraq.  The following passage from the preface to the book  strongly indicates that his actions on this issue, while a member of the House of Representatives, were entirely consistent with the platform of the Constitution Party: 
     
    "...it is incumbent upon conservatives to acknowledge that the conflict in Iraq, which began with the invasion of March 2003, was inconsistent with longstanding principles of the foreign policy of our constitutional republic. I contended as much when I voted against the House resolution that granted President Bush the unconstitutional authority to declare war. I was convinced of it when I learned the true motivation of those who were most invested in selling the case for a "preemptive" strike against the regime of Saddam Hussein."
     
    For more information concerning John  Hostettler, his current activities and his new book please visit:
     
     
    Featured speakers at the meeting will be Chuck Baldwin and Darrell Castle, the Constitution Party's 2008 nominees for President and Vice-President.  The Baldwin/Castle ticket, which was also endorsed by Congressman Ron Paul, set a Constitution Party record for total popular vote, despite unusual circumstances which kept it off the ballot in some large states such as California and Pennsylvania.  In the 37 states where the Baldwin/Castle ticket did secure ballot access the Constitution Party vote increased dramatically.  Also, while write-in votes have not yet been tabulated in all states, results in those states where those totals have been made public such as Texas, Georgia and Connecticut have revealed significant popular support for the Constitution Party ticket.  This bodes well for future elections when the Constitution Party, of course, expects to be on the ballots in all 50 states.
     
    An additional speaking attraction at the Orlando meeting will be party founder and former Presidential nominee, Howard Phillips.  Phillips is currently Chairman of The Conservative Caucus, "America's Constitutional Government Action Organization," which has been a leader in the fight to stop the North American Union and now is spearheading the campaign to stop Obama's "Socialist Revolution."
     
    The Constitution Party National Committee  meeting will be held December 12-13 in Orlando, Florida, at the Embassy Suites – Orlando Airport, 5835 T.G. Lee Boulevard, Orlando FL 32822.   The public is invited to attend.  For further details and registration information please visit: http://www.constitutionparty.com/view_events.php .
     
    So, take a break, bring the family, and come to the National Committee meeting in Orlando on December 12 and 13. Meet Constitution Party leaders from around the country, listen in on strategy sessions, and hear great speakers. Don't miss this
    important Constitution Party event!
     


    November 19

    Constitution Party Newsletter

    YOUR PARTY, YOUR PRINCIPLES PASS THIS ON!
    Mary Starrett
    Communications Director



    PRESS RELEASE:

    Obama - McCain Meeting Shows “Not A Dime’s Worth Of Difference” Between Two

     

    The “Fix” Is In: Same-Old–Same-Old Two Party Charade

     

     

    Lancaster, PA, (November 17,2008) The Constitution Party (www.constitutionparty.com), America’s fastest- growing third party, points out Monday’s meeting between president-elect Barack Obama and former GOP rival John McCain (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27764127/) shows the striking similarity of both candidates when it comes to the issues.

     

    Obama promised that his meeting with McCain was to “have a good conversation about how we can do some work together to fix up the country.”

     

    Constitution Party National Committee Chairman Jim Clymer said, “It’s ludicrous to hear Obama say he and McCain can talk about “fixing-up” the country when both these candidates supported the disastrous so-called “bailouts” which can do no such thing.”

     

    Clymer added, “To think that the American people fell for the ‘two party’ ruse thinking all along they were actually voting for any politically distinct ideology is absurd.”

     

    During Monday’s meeting with McCain, Obama said, “"We shouldn't worry about the deficit next year or even the year after. ...”

     

    “It’s precisely that kind of thinking that got us into this mess in the first place”, Clymer, noted.

     

    The Constitution Party challenged voters during the election to show any measurable difference between the two candidates on issues like illegal immigration, second amendment gun-owner rights, taxation, foreign intervention, unconstitutional wars and job-destroying “free-trade” schemes like NAFTA and GATT.

     

    During Monday’s meeting, president-elect Obama pledged to ‘restore America’s moral standing in the world”.

     

    “This statement comes from the U.S. Senate’s most rabid pro-abort”, said Clymer. “If Obama was so determined to ‘restore America’s moral standing in the world” he would have started in Illinois. He would not have fought so hard to defeat the ‘Born Alive Infant Protection Act’.” (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18647) That legislation offered babies who survived late term abortions humane care until their death.

     

     “Obama apparently thinks infanticide is A-ok, at least during the first few hours post birth, and now he has the audacity of hope for “moral standing” in the world?” Clymer asked.

     

    The Constitution Party’s candidate for president, Chuck Baldwin, was the only candidate for president who was pro-life, pro-secure borders and pro-2nd amendment.  Baldwin opposed the “bailouts”, challenged the constitutionality of the war in Iraq and promoted the abolishment of the Federal Reserve and IRS. Baldwin was on the ballot in 37 states.

     

    ####

     

    To keep the work of the Constitution Party moving forward please Donate Now 

    � 2008 Constitution Party National Committee. All Rights Reserved.   To unsubscribe from our newsletters click here.
    Please visit our website and support our work by donating
    Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Donate Now!  |  Privacy Policy
    November 11

    CyberAlert

    The 2,769th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996
    8:40am EST, Tuesday November 11, 2008 (Vol. Thirteen; No. 214)

    1. Time: Obama a 'Prince' Like Jesus Born of 'Imagination and Hope' Warning its readers to "be prepared to gag," the "Scrapbook" page of this week's Weekly Standard magazine recited "some of the worst over-the-top reactions to The One's ascendance," starting with Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story by comparing Obama with Jesus: "Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope..." In the November 17 issue, she heralded (citing his full name) the greater meaning of Obama's victory: "Barack Hussein Obama did not win because of the color of his skin. Nor did he win in spite of it. He won because at a very dangerous moment in the life of a still young country, more people than have ever spoken before came together to try to save it. And that was a victory all its own."

    2. NBC News Sells Commemorative Obama 'Yes We Can!' DVD Right before the 9:35am segment on Monday's Today show, a commercial from NBC News aired announcing a special DVD on Barack Obama's life story for sale on its Web site. What is particularly odd is that a news organization would actually use Obama's own campaign slogan to title the DVD, and if memory serves there was no special DVD offered for George W. Bush's inauguration. How much time will the DVD devote to such gaffes as Barack's "bitter" quote or Michelle's "For the first time...I'm proud to be an American," quote as well as any Jeremiah Wright/Bill Ayers mentions compared to any time given to NBC's own Chris Matthews and Lee Cowan "thrill" moments?

    3. Stephanopoulos: 'Impossible' Not to Be Excited by Obama Win Former top Democratic aide-turned journalist George Stephanopoulos appeared on Friday's edition of the Oprah Winfrey Show and agreed with the host that it was "impossible" not to feel exuberant when Barack Obama was declared the winner on election night. Stephanopoulos also repeatedly admitted that he fervently believed all along the Democratic candidate would defeat Senator John McCain. Stephanopoulos' wife, actress Ali Wentworth, also appeared as part of the show's weekly "Oprah Fridays Live" series and asserted that in the spring she asked her reporter husband: "Is Obama going to win? Is Obama going to win? He said, 'Yes. He's going to win.'"


     

    Time: Obama a 'Prince' Like Jesus Born
    of 'Imagination and Hope'

         Warning its readers to "be prepared to gag," the "Scrapbook" page of this week's Weekly Standard magazine recited "some of the worst over-the-top reactions to The One's ascendance," starting with Time's Nancy Gibbs who opened this week's cover story by comparing Obama with Jesus: "Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope..." In the November 17 issue, she heralded (citing his full name) the greater meaning of Obama's victory: "Barack Hussein Obama did not win because of the color of his skin. Nor did he win in spite of it. He won because at a very dangerous moment in the life of a still young country, more people than have ever spoken before came together to try to save it. And that was a victory all its own."

         She gushed over how "an election in one of the world's oldest democracies looked like the kind they hold in brand-new ones, when citizens finally come out and dance, a purple-thumb day, a velvet revolution."

         Gibbs also trumpeted: "He let loose a deep blue wave that washed well past the coasts and the college towns, into the South through Virginia and Florida, the Mountain West with Colorado and New Mexico, into the Ohio Valley and the Midwestern battlegrounds: you could almost walk from Maine to Minnesota without getting your feet wet in a red state. After months of mapmaking all the roads to 270, Obama tore right past with ease. The victory poured down the ballot, bringing along a larger Democratic majority in both houses..."

         Online, the story is headlined "How Obama Rewrote the Book." The actual November 17 edition of the magazine doesn't have that headline and instead just has an Obama quote by a big smiling photo of him from election night: "This Is Our Time." The Gibbs story: www.time.com

         [This item, by the MRC's Brent Baker, was posted Monday night on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         Her entire lead paragraph: "Some princes are born in palaces. Some are born in mangers. But a few are born in the imagination, out of scraps of history and hope. Barack Obama never talks about how people see him: I'm not the one making history, he said every chance he got. You are. Yet as he looked out Tuesday night through the bulletproof glass, in a park named for a Civil War general, he had to see the truth on people's faces. We are the ones we've been waiting for, he liked to say, but people were waiting for him, waiting for someone to finish what a King began."

         Back in 2003, Gibbs asked Hillary Clinton: "Is the 'vast, right-wing conspiracy' bigger than you thought?" The June 9, 2003 CyberAlert recounted:

    An actual question from Time magazine's Nancy Gibbs to Hillary Clinton in an interview for this week's issue which accompanies the magazine's cover story excerpt of her new book: "Is the 'vast, right-wing conspiracy' bigger than you thought when you brought that term into our vocabulary?"

    So much for any notion that maybe the VRWC doesn't exist or that Hillary might owe an apology to those she smeared with the charge when the Lewinsky story turned out to be true.

    But that wasn't the only question from Gibbs which presumed conservatives were in the wrong. Gibbs wondered: "In the book you have a lot to say about forgiveness. Have you forgiven Ken Starr?"

    And before asking about letting a President run for a third term and if she plans to make a presidential run, Gibbs queried: "Would you call Bush a radical?"

         Previous CyberAlert in full: www.mediaresearch.org

         The second entry in the November 17 Weekly Standard's "The Courtier Chronicles" came from former New York Times reporter E.J. Dionne Jr. in his Washington Post column the day after the election:

    Yes, it is time to hope again.

    Time to hope that the era of racial backlash and wedge politics is over. Time to imagine that the patriotism of dissenters will no longer be questioned and that the world will no longer be divided between 'values voters' and those with no moral compass. Time to expect that an ideological label will no longer be enough to disqualify a politician.

    Above all, it is time to celebrate the country's wholehearted embrace of democracy, reflected in the intense engagement of Americans in this campaign and the outpouring to the polls all over the nation. For years, we have spoken of bringing free elections to the rest of the world even as we cynically mocked our own ways of conducting politics. Yesterday, we chose to practice what we have been preaching....

         Registered Weekly Standard users can see the "Scrapbook" section: www.weeklystandard.com

     

    NBC News Sells Commemorative Obama 'Yes
    We Can!' DVD

         Right before the 9:35am segment on Monday's Today show, a commercial from NBC News aired announcing a special DVD on Barack Obama's life story for sale on its Web site. What is particularly odd is that a news organization would actually use Obama's own campaign slogan to title the DVD, and if memory serves there was no special DVD offered for George W. Bush's inauguration. How much time will the DVD devote to such gaffes as Barack's "bitter" quote or Michelle's "For the first time...I'm proud to be an American," quote as well as any Jeremiah Wright/Bill Ayers mentions compared to any time given to NBC's own Chris Matthews and Lee Cowan "thrill" moments?

         [This item, by the MRC's Geoffrey Dickens, was posted Monday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         The following ad aired during the November 10 Today show: "NBC News Presents, 'Yes We Can! The Barack Obama Story!' A DVD of his life and road to the White House. Pre-order now at NBCSTORE.COM."

         The description of the video on the NBC Store Web site:

    NBC News presents "Yes We Can!" the story of Barack Obama. This commemorative DVD takes you through the story of Barack Obama's life -- his campaign to win his party's nomination, his campaign for the presidency, and finally his victorious history-making win. DVD extras include footage of the full inspiring speeches which were the most pivotal and memorable ones of his 2-year campaign.

    Run Time: approx. 4 Hours

         To see how the video is being sold on the NBC Web site, visit: www.nbcuniversalstore.com

     

    Stephanopoulos: 'Impossible' Not to Be
    Excited by Obama Win

         Former top Democratic aide-turned journalist George Stephanopoulos appeared on Friday's edition of the Oprah Winfrey Show and agreed with the host that it was "impossible" not to feel exuberant when Barack Obama was declared the winner on election night. Stephanopoulos also repeatedly admitted that he fervently believed all along the Democratic candidate would defeat Senator John McCain. Stephanopoulos' wife, actress Ali Wentworth, also appeared as part of the show's weekly "Oprah Fridays Live" series and asserted that in the spring she asked her reporter husband: "Is Obama going to win? Is Obama going to win? He said, 'Yes. He's going to win.'"

         Wentworth elaborated: "And I was texting him during the election. Like, 'Really? Absolutely?' He would say, 'Easily. It's done. Yes.' Which was so- [Stops herself.]" Fellow panelist Mark Consuelos (an actor and husband of Kelly Ripa) also recounted the supposedly neutral journalist assuring him that Obama would be victorious. He explained: "We had dinner together over the summer and I sat next to you....I said, I'm a supporter but I just don't, I, feel nervous that America is not ready to elect, you know, Obama." Consuelos repeated the confident reply: "And he [Stephanopoulos] said, 'November 4, Obama will be elected president. Please pass the rigatoni,' is exactly what he said."

         [This item, by the MRC's Scott Whitlock, was posted Monday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         This is the same George Stephanopoulos who repeatedly fawned over the Democrat's campaign performance. In coverage of the debates, Stephanopoulos declared Obama and his vice presidential running mate Joe Biden the winner each and every time. See an October 16 CyberAlert item: www.mrc.org

         So, Oprah viewers might have been forgiven for laughing when Winfrey, herself a strong supporter of Obama, seriously declared: "I think even all the journalists and you have handled yourself, you know, with such, you know, measured restraint through all this, even if you knew last spring that Barack Obama was going to win. But didn't you even on Tuesday night feel a sense of exuberance, George?"

         With no hesitation, Stephanopoulos concurred: "It was impossible not to." He then went on to cite the historic nature of Obama being the first African American president. Certainly, it was historic. But, exuberance? Few conservatives felt exuberant over the tax increases that they expect to come or the liberal Supreme Court judges that they believe will be nominated.

         Speaking of the apparent lack of any hesitation for Americans to vote for an African American candidate, Stephanopoulos hinted, "The economy for so many people is in such tough shape. You saw these numbers this morning. Another 240,000 jobs lost. That they were able to look beyond so many other issues that might have held them back in the past." He was citing a column by New York Times writer Tom Friedman at this point. But it still sounds like saying that Americans could look past racism because of a poor economy.

         Stephanopoulos has a bit of a history in this area. On the May 13, 2007 edition of This Week, he predicted racists don't vote for Democrats anyway: "I guess I think that anyone who's not going to vote for Barack Obama because he is black isn't going to vote for a Democrat anyway." See a May 14, 2007 CyberAlert posting for more: www.mrc.org

         A partial transcript of Stephanopoulos' appearance over three segments on Friday's Oprah Winfrey Show:

         ALI WENTWORTH (Actress, wife of Stephanopoulos): So, honey, we were not together. You were covering the election when Barack Obama won. I was with our children, feeding them nutritiously. But you called it so long ago. I think last spring. I kept saying to him, what do you think? Is Obama going to win? Is Obama going to win? He said, yes. He's going to win. And I was- Last spring. And I was texting him during the election. Like, Really? Absolutely? He would say, "Easily. It's done. Yes." Which was so- [Stops herself.]
         GAYLE KING: How did you know? How did you know, George? How did you know that?
         GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: It was more- the condition of the country. It's just very, very hard for the incumbent party to hold the White House when the president is so unpopular, when the economy is in such bad shape, and when you're trying for essentially a third term for the same party. So, I thought once Barack got the nomination, I thought unless he really made a huge mistake, over the course of the summer, the fall, he would almost certainly win. And basically from June on he didn't make any mistakes.
         MARK CONSUELOS (Actor): Hey, George. We had dinner together over the summer and I sat next to you and I said, okay, forgive me for asking you this question. I was nervous. I said, I'm a supporter but I just don't- I - feel nervous that America is not ready to elect, you know, Obama. He said, November 4-
         KING: Elect Obama or elect a black man?
         CONSUELOS: Both. And he said, "November 4, Obama will be elected president. Please pass the rigatoni" is exactly what he said.
         STEPHANOPOULOS: And the rigatoni was terrific by the way.
         CONSUELOS: The rigatoni was great.
         STEPHANOPOULOS: And you get at something- One of the most surprising things to me in this entire election was how little of it was about race. I mean, it's really shocking when you think about it. The first African American who is a serious candidate, who has a real serious chance of being president and most people looked way beyond race. Like, we asked about this in our polls, 80 percent of the country said it didn't matter at all in their vote. Only about 20 percent did. And they kind of split.
         OPRAH: WINFREY: You know, I thought it was interesting too, because when the press started talking about the Bradley Effect, what had happened in California many years ago, I thought, well, I think we are so far beyond that in this country that bringing up the Bradley Effect now makes people, you know, gives it an energy and power it might not have had.
         STEPHANOPOULOS: I think that's right. It turned out the Bradley effect might not even have been the Bradley effect. But, the best line I heard about that in this election is the New York Times columnist Tom Friedman. Thomas Friedman who said in this election the Bradley Effect may have been overwhelmed by the Buffet Effect. And what he was talking about is Warren Buffet. And what he means is the economy. The economy for so many people is in such tough shape. You saw these numbers this morning. Another 240,000 jobs lost. That they were able to look beyond so many other issues that might have held them back in the past.

    ...

         WINFREY: Everybody talked about that they're praying for him. Do you know for the past 30 days in the makeup room every morning, makeup artists, hair stylists, Louise, all of us we would stop at 8:00 in the morning and pray for Barack Obama? A lot of people are doing that.

    ...

         WENTWORTH: But, we felt early on that when the McCain- when they announced Sarah Palin as the VP, it felt, I think, as a very desperate thing even back then.
         CONSUELOS: It felt gimmicky.
         WINFREY: Okay. Let George answer.
         STEPHANOPOULOS: I think so much of this is actually just personal because you're right. What everything you have to say makes sense. It doesn't make any sense for them to make themselves look like liars, now all of a sudden saying she really wasn't ready to be president. But I think what happened here is that over the course of the couple of months, the people from the McCain camp who worked very closely with Governor Palin, a lot of them, at least, got kind of fed up. They felt that she wasn't always doing her homework, some of them. They also felt that one of the McCain staffers was getting blamed for this clothing purchase which they said, look, it wasn't true. She had nothing to do with it. So, they were fighting back. And I think their feelings were rubbed so raw and they were so emotional about it they didn't care how about it would look later.

    ...

         WINFREY: But even as a journalist, I mean, I think even all the journalists and you have handled yourself, you know, with such, you know, measured restraint through all this, even if you knew last spring that Barack Obama was going to win. But didn't you even on Tuesday night feel a sense of exuberance, George?
         STEPHANOPOULOS: It- It was impossible not to. The moment, again, whenever your politics, Democrat, Republican, independent, this was a major moment, signature moment in American history. This was a country that, you know, we had slaves not too long ago. Only 45 years ago, the Civil Rights act was signed into law. And at the very moment when the election was officially called at 11:00, I was there with Charlie Gibson and Diane Sawyer and I. And Charlie announced it and we all just went silent and let the moment happen.
         WINFREY: It was a very sobering moment.
         STEPHANOPOULOS: And that was the best way to honor the moment.

    -- Brent Baker

    November 10

    Cyber Alert

    The 2,768th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996
    8:50am EST, Monday November 10, 2008 (Vol. Thirteen; No. 213)

    1. Reuters Laugher: 'Media Bias Largely Unseen in Presidential Race' File under: Don't believe your lying eyes and ears. Barely two weeks after a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey determined that "by a margin of 70%-9%, Americans say most journalists want to see Obama, not John McCain, win on Nov. 4," as even 62 percent of Democrats recognized how journalists hoped Obama would be victorious, Reuters set out to prove any and all favorable Obama coverage had nothing to do with liberal bias. In a November 6 dispatch, "Media bias largely unseen in U.S. presidential race," Steve Gorman of the Los Angeles bureau focused his story on undermining the "perception that mainstream news organizations routinely gave Obama preferential treatment en route to his election as the first black U.S. president." Gorman contended: "But media scholars, including a former top aide to McCain, disagree. They said campaign coverage often did lean in Obama's favor, though not -- as many conservatives have suggested -- because of a hidden liberal agenda on the part of the media. Instead, academic experts said, Obama benefited largely from the dynamics of the campaign itself and the media's tendency to focus on the 'horse race'..."

    2. Colby King on GOP's Make Up: Nationalist Party of South Africa Washington Post columnist Colby King charged Friday night that a look those who attended McCain-Palin rallies -- presumably meaning all-white -- versus those who went to Obama events, plus a "look at the census projections and what do you see? The Nationalist Party of South Africa."

    3. ABC Allows Jeremiah Wright to Spin Himself as Victim of Media Good Morning America co-host Diane Sawyer on Friday uncritically highlighted an address given by the Reverend Jeremiah Wright on Thursday and parroted his talking points about being a scapegoat. In a tease for the segment, she recited: "Reverend Jeremiah Wright is now speaking out again. He says he was turned into a weapon of mass destruction." Regarding his speech, given in a church in Milford, Connecticut, Sawyer blandly added that Senator Barack Obama "distanced himself from Reverend Wright during the campaign and labeled some of his sermons divisive." She then proceeded to play a 47 second long clip of Wright complaining that the media intended to use his sermons to destroy Obama. An ABC graphic almost apologetically read, "First Comments From Rev Wright: Media's 'Weapon on Mass Destruction'"

    4. CNN's Campbell Brown: 'Right-Wing Rage' at Obama Victory CNN anchor Campbell Brown introduced a segment on Thursday's Election Center program by contrasting the "[p]eople all over the world dancing in the streets" over the election of Barack Obama to the "really, really angry" reaction of conservatives, which she then labeled "right-wing rage." A graphic with the same label flashed on-screen, accompanied by a picture of Obama smiling. During the segment, which aired just after the bottom-half of the 8 pm Eastern hour of the CNN program, CNN correspondent Joe Johns played an audio clip of conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh as an example of such "rage." Limbaugh, who reacting to the appointment of liberal Illinois Representative Rahm Emanuel as Obama's White House Chief of Staff, called Emanuel a "good old-fashioned Chicago thug, just like Obama is a good old-fashioned Chicago thug," and gave an anecdote about how Emanuel used a steak knife to demonstrate his own anger towards Bill Clinton's enemies after the 1992 election. Johns' reply after the clip: "So if you were thinking the country is now unified, think again. There are still deep divisions."

    5. ABC's Claire Shipman Bizarrely Spins Rahm Emanuel as 'Centrist' Good Morning America reporter Claire Shipman continued a time honored media bias tradition on Friday when she mislabeled Congressman Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama's newly selected chief of staff, as "centrist." Emanuel, who was elected to Congress in 2002, has a lifetime American Conservative Union score of 13. In 2006, his rank was only four. In contrast, the House member's average from the liberal group Americans for Democratic Action is a very high 96. And yet, Shipman erroneously asserted: "More than anything, the 48-year-old Illinois representative is a pragmatic, centrist politician who likes to get things done. Clearly, Obama wants the same thing." So, can Americans expect Obama to be the same type of "centrist" that Emanuel has been?

    6. On Friday Night, ABC & NBC Fail to Correct Obama's 'Seance' Gaffe Friday night stories on ABC's World News and the NBC Nightly News ran a clip of President-elect Barack Obama's gaffe at his press conference in which he related he had talked to all of the "living" former Presidents, as "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances." But both newscasts failed to note it was Hillary Clinton, not Nancy Reagan, who reportedly had seances in the White House. ABC's Jake Tapper called Obama's comment "a lighter moment" while NBC's Lee Cowan described it as "the only awkward moment of his first meeting with the press." FNC's Jim Angle, however, managed to point out in his 6 PM EST story: "It was actually Hillary Clinton who was reported to have engaged in seance-like sessions in which she communed with the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt."

    7. CBS's Smith: 'Will Obamas Return to Camelot in the White House?' Continuing the narrative of Barack Obama as John F. Kennedy, on Friday's CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith described how: "As the nation prepares for President-Elect Barack Obama to move into the White House, many Americans can't help but draw similarities between him and the late President John F. Kennedy." Co-host Julie Chen earlier teased the segment: "The new first family has been compared to JFK and Jackie and their young children. Can the Obamas bring that 'one brief shining moment,' that was known as Camelot, back to the White House?" Smith narrated the segment, which juxtaposed images JFK with Obama: "It was a presidency filled with idealism, glamour, and excitement...A young Senator had been elected to lead his country. Now 47 years later, America has chosen another young Senator." Smith went on: "And the similarities are striking...."

    8. CNN's Rick Sanchez Urges Obama to Bring Back FDR's WPA & CCC President-elect Obama's economic plans aren't left-wing and government-centered enough for CNN anchor Rick Sanchez, who about 20 minutes after Obama's Friday afternoon press conference shared his personal suggestion for another WPA (Works Progress Administration) and/or CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps), two government make-work programs from the 1930s. To a guest who lived through the Depression as a child, Sanchez proposed: "I'm thinking WPA, I'm thinking it may be time for Americans to do something like that once again because there's so many people unemployed and there's so much that needs to be done in this country." With another guest in the same 3:30 PM EST segment, Sanchez cited energy requirements and wondered: "Isn't this the kind of need that could be met by American workers if the government created a WPA or CCC plan?"


     

    Reuters Laugher: 'Media Bias Largely
    Unseen in Presidential Race'

         File under: Don't believe your lying eyes and ears. Barely two weeks after a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey determined that "by a margin of 70%-9%, Americans say most journalists want to see Obama, not John McCain, win on Nov. 4," as even 62 percent of Democrats recognized how journalists hoped Obama would be victorious, Reuters set out to prove any and all favorable Obama coverage had nothing to do with liberal bias. In a November 6 dispatch, "Media bias largely unseen in U.S. presidential race," Steve Gorman of the Los Angeles bureau focused his story on undermining the "perception that mainstream news organizations routinely gave Obama preferential treatment en route to his election as the first black U.S. president." Gorman contended:
         "But media scholars, including a former top aide to McCain, disagree. They said campaign coverage often did lean in Obama's favor, though not -- as many conservatives have suggested -- because of a hidden liberal agenda on the part of the media. Instead, academic experts said, Obama benefited largely from the dynamics of the campaign itself and the media's tendency to focus on the 'horse race,' emphasizing ups and downs in the polls and political tactics. As Obama's poll numbers rose in response to events, so did favorable press coverage for him, not the other way round."

         Who said the liberal agenda was "hidden"? It was out in the open for all but Gorman to see.

         [This item, by the MRC's Brent Baker, was posted Sunday night on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         Two of Gorman's equally blind experts:

         "'Winning begets winning coverage,' said Mark Jurkowitz, an author of a study by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism that tracked campaign coverage.

         "Dan Schnur, communications director for McCain's 2000 presidential bid and now head of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at the University of Southern California, agreed. 'I don't think there's partisan or ideological bias because the mainstream media tries not to take sides in policy disagreements,' he said. 'Favorable news coverage is...more a function of favorable poll numbers.'"

         The Reuters story: www.reuters.com

         Of course, the pro-Obama idolatry went far beyond horse race stories. Just take a look at the MRC's "Barack Obama's Media Groupies" collection of quotes. Here are several from long before Obama was above single-digits:

    Run, Barack, Run!

    "Obama's personal appeal is made manifest when he steps down from the podium and is swarmed by well-wishers of all ages and hues....Obama seemed the political equivalent of a rainbow -- a sudden preternatural event inspiring awe and ecstasy....He transcends the racial divide so effortlessly that it seems reasonable to expect that he can bridge all the other divisions -- and answer all the impossible questions â€" plaguing American public life." -- Time's Joe Klein, October 23, 2006 cover story, "Why Barack Obama Could Be the Next President."

    "Many people, afterwards [after Obama's 2004 convention speech], they weren't sure how to pronounce your name but they were moved by you. People were crying. You tapped into something. You touched people....If your party says to you, 'We need you,' and, and there's already a drumbeat out there, will you respond?" -- Co-host Meredith Vieira to Obama on NBC's Today, October 19, 2006.


    Is He "The One?"

    "You can see it in the crowds. The thrill, the hope. How they surge toward him. You're looking at an American political phenomenon....He inspires the party faithful and many others, like no one else on the scene today....And the question you can sense on everyone's mind, as they listen so intently to him, is he the one? Is Barack Obama the man, the black man, who could lead the Democrats back to the White House and maybe even unite the country?...Everywhere he goes, people want him to run for President, especially in Iowa, cradle of presidential contenders. Around here, they're even naming babies after him." -- ABC Nightline co-anchor Terry Moran, Nov. 6, 2006.


    The Ultimate Obama Fan

    Senator Barack Obama: "Let's roll back the Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans, let's make certain that those resources go to the people who need it....We're not going to solve it by pretending that issues of poverty and struggle among working families are just going to go away magically because the stock market is going up." Moderator Chris Matthews: "So much of what you say just grabs people like me, because it sounds like Bobby Kennedy. It sounds like the '60s at its absolute best." -- Exchange at AFSCME Democratic candidates forum shown live on MSNBC, June 19, 2007.

         For videos of those quotes, and many, many more, go to the "Campaign 2008 Review: Barack Obama's Media Groupies" special November 3 edition of Notable Quotables: www.mrc.org

         More on the Pew poll: The October 24 CyberAlert item, "By Nearly 8-to-1, Voters Say Journalists Want Obama to Win," recounted:

    "Voters overwhelmingly believe that the media wants Barack Obama to win the presidential election," a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey released Wednesday discovered. Specifically: "By a margin of 70%-9%, Americans say most journalists want to see Obama, not John McCain, win on Nov. 4. Another 8% say journalists don't favor either candidate, and 13% say they don't know which candidate most reporters support." The question: "Who do you think most newspaper reporters and TV journalists want to see win the presidential election -- Barack Obama or John McCain?" Unsurprisingly, 90 percent of Republicans recognized how journalists hope Obama is victorious, yet so did 62 percent of Democrats and independents.

         Full rundown: www.mrc.org

         For many more surveys this year which found the public saw a pro-Obama and/or anti-McCain or anti-Palin bias, check the "How the Public Views the Media" section of the MRC's "Media Bias Basics." Go to: www.mediaresearch.org

         Thanks to James Taranto for highlighting the Reuters article in his Friday "Best of the Web Today" compilation, where he put the Reuters headline under this heading: "If They Do Say So Themselves." See: online.wsj.com

     

    Colby King on GOP's Make Up: Nationalist
    Party of South Africa

         Washington Post columnist Colby King charged Friday night that a look those who attended McCain-Palin rallies -- presumably meaning all-white -- versus those who went to Obama events, plus a "look at the census projections and what do you see? The Nationalist Party of South Africa."

         On Inside Washington, a weekly show produced and aired over the weekend by Washington, DC's ABC affiliate, but first broadcast Friday night on the local PBS station, the Post's deputy editorial page editor from 2000 to 2007 framed the challenge ahead for Republicans: "I think we're looking at something different here, a larger problem. If you just look at the optics, look at the Republican and Democratic conventions, look at the McCain-Palin rallies and Obama rallies, look at the demographics and then look at the census projections and what do you see? The Nationalist Party of South Africa -- not with the ideology, but in the make up -- in the future."

         That was the party which enforced apartheid until 1994.

         [This item, by the MRC's Brent Baker, was posted Saturday on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         Washington Post bio of King: www.washingtonpost.com

     

    ABC Allows Jeremiah Wright to Spin Himself
    as Victim of Media

         Good Morning America co-host Diane Sawyer on Friday uncritically highlighted an address given by the Reverend Jeremiah Wright on Thursday and parroted his talking points about being a scapegoat. In a tease for the segment, she recited: "Reverend Jeremiah Wright is now speaking out again. He says he was turned into a weapon of mass destruction."

         Regarding his speech, given in a church in Milford, Connecticut, Sawyer blandly added that Senator Barack Obama "distanced himself from Reverend Wright during the campaign and labeled some of his sermons divisive." She then proceeded to play a 47 second long clip of Wright complaining that the media intended to use his sermons to destroy Obama. An ABC graphic almost apologetically read, "First Comments From Rev Wright: Media's 'Weapon on Mass Destruction'"

         [This item, by the MRC's Scott Whitlock, was posted Friday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         And yet, it was shows like Good Morning America that largely ignored many of Wright's more extreme sermons, such as in April of 2003 when he erroneously asserted, "The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color!"

         In fact, far from trashing Wright, Good Morning America reporter David Wright cooed on April 25, 2008: "But the soft-spoken man who sits down with [journalist] Bill Moyers couldn't seem more different from that fire-brand preacher we've all seen in those soundbites." See an April 28 CyberAlert posting for more: www.mrc.org

         On April 30, Wright followed up and sympathetically discussed Obama's very public break with his pastor: "Imagine having to publicly denounce the minister who married you, who baptized your kids, who prayed with you the day you announced your candidacy for president." See a May 1 CyberAlert posting for more: www.mrc.org

         A transcript of the November 7 segment, which aired at 7:12am:

         7am tease
         DIANE SAWYER: And also, this morning, the man who created such an explosion during the campaign, then went silent. Reverend Jeremiah Wright is now speaking out again. He says he was turned into a weapon of mass destruction. And he tells how he feels about the election of Barack Obama.

         7:12am
         DIANE SAWYER: And now, last night, President-elect Obama's controversial former pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, reemerged, debating race, religion and American history at a Connecticut church. Senator Obama, of course, had distanced himself from Reverend Wright during the campaign and labeled some of his sermons divisive. Last night, Wright reflected on that and how the coverage of him affected, he says, his family.
         ABC GRAPHIC: First Comments From Rev Wright: Media's "Weapon on Mass Destruction"
         REVEREND BARACK OBAMA: My youngest child came home from school and said to me, "Are you and Barack cool? I said, "Of course, we are. Why do you ask that?" "I just had kids talking in school." I said, "Now, that's a media thing." 90 percent of people sitting in church do not agree with everything their pastor is saying. What I say or don't say, it is not an index in terms of what Senator Obama believed or believes. The media did not want that sermon heard. Their intention was to use me as a weapon of mass destruction to destroy that man's candidacy. Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan, Barack Obama, their successes individually should not lull us to sleep to think this is now it's all over. Everything is solved. There are some serious structural problems that keep people locked into poverty.
         SAWYER: And, so, we hear from Reverend Wright once again.

     

    CNN's Campbell Brown: 'Right-Wing Rage'
    at Obama Victory

         CNN anchor Campbell Brown introduced a segment on Thursday's Election Center program by contrasting the "[p]eople all over the world dancing in the streets" over the election of Barack Obama to the "really, really angry" reaction of conservatives, which she then labeled "right-wing rage." A graphic with the same label flashed on-screen, accompanied by a picture of Obama smiling.

         During the segment, which aired just after the bottom-half of the 8 pm Eastern hour of the CNN program, CNN correspondent Joe Johns played an audio clip of conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh as an example of such "rage." Limbaugh, who reacting to the appointment of liberal Illinois Representative Rahm Emanuel as Obama's White House Chief of Staff, called Emanuel a "good old-fashioned Chicago thug, just like Obama is a good old-fashioned Chicago thug," and gave an anecdote about how Emanuel used a steak knife to demonstrate his own anger towards Bill Clinton's enemies after the 1992 election. Johns' reply after the clip: "So if you were thinking the country is now unified, think again. There are still deep divisions."

         [This item, by the MRC's Matthew Balan, was posted Friday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         The CNN correspondent then continued by stating how "[s]ome conservatives say the message that brought them to victory in Congress in the 90s is still viable. Remember, they rode in on a wave of pushing things like smaller government and less spending. It was a return to an update of classic Grand Old Party themes." He then played a clip from David Keene of the American Conservative Union, who outlined how Republicans strayed from conservative principles over the past six or eight years.

         The full transcript of the segment from the November 6 Election Center:

         CAMPBELL BROWN: We all saw the pictures on election night. People all over the world dancing in the streets. But some Americans, particularly conservatives, have very different feelings about President-Elect Obama. Many of them feeling really, really angry right now, and Joe Johns has been listening to what can only be called 'right-wing rage.' And Joe, tell us what these conservatives are saying.
         JOE JOHNS: Well, Campbell, there is a certain amount of hand-wringing and that is to be expected. There are those who are already comparing this to the early 90s when Bill Clinton won. As everyone remembers, Republicans regrouped, and it wasn't long before Newt Gingrich and his conservative army swept to victory in the House. And guess who's also hammering away at the Democrats -- conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh, blasting both Rahm Emanuel and Barack Obama hours after the polls closed.
         RUSH LIMBAUGH: He is [a] good old-fashioned Chicago thug, just like Obama is a good old-fashioned Chicago thug. On the night of the Clinton election, Rahm Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign -- Rahm Emanuel grabbed a steak knife and he began rattling off a list of betrayers, and as he listed their names, he shouted, 'Dead! Dead! Dead!' And he plunged the steak knife into the table after every name. This is not a bunch of people that are going to [govern from the center] --
         JOHNS: So if you were thinking the country is now unified, think again. There are still deep divisions. Some conservatives say the message that brought them to victory in Congress in the 90s is still viable. Remember, they rode in on a wave of pushing things like smaller government and less spending. It was a return to an update of classic Grand Old Party themes.
         DAVID KEENE, AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION: All those lines got blurred during the course of the last six or eight years. Republicans in Congress began to act like the Democrats that they've gotten rid off in the 90s. The president began to spend money like he was Lyndon Johnson, and the result was that voters began to get very upset. So, yes, you have to go back to your basics.
         JOHNS: That, of course, was David Keene of the American Conservative Union. But make no mistake, this whole thing would be rehashed a thousand times before there's another election. Campbell?
         BROWN: All right. Joe Johns for us tonight. Joe, thanks.

     

    ABC's Claire Shipman Bizarrely Spins
    Rahm Emanuel as 'Centrist'

         Good Morning America reporter Claire Shipman continued a time honored media bias tradition on Friday when she mislabeled Congressman Rahm Emanuel, Barack Obama's newly selected chief of staff, as "centrist." Emanuel, who was elected to Congress in 2002, has a lifetime American Conservative Union score of 13. See ACU: www.acuratings.org

         In 2006, his rank was only four. In contrast, the House member's average from the liberal group Americans for Democratic Action is a very high 96. See ADA: www.adaction.org

         And yet, Shipman erroneously asserted: "More than anything, the 48-year-old Illinois representative is a pragmatic, centrist politician who likes to get things done. Clearly, Obama wants the same thing." So, can Americans expect Obama to be the same type of "centrist" that Emanuel has been?

         Shipman is not the first journalist to try and spin the aggressive Illinois congressman as a moderate. On Wednesday's American Morning, CNN special correspondent Frank Sesno described Emanuel as someone who is seen to be "on the center to center-right." See a November 7 CyberAlert posting: www.mrc.org

         [This item, by the MRC's Scott Whitlock, was posted Friday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         Interestingly, the rest of Shipman's report actually featured more negative descriptions of the soon to be chief of staff. Co-host Robin Roberts commented on his "abrasive style." She observed, "He once jokingly told the Chicago Tribune, quote, 'I wake up some mornings hating me, too.'" Shipman labeled him "hard-charging" and "in-your-face." She added, "Emanuel was so abrasive early on in the Clinton White House, Hillary Clinton wanted him fired."

         In what could be seen as a conflict of interest, former top Democratic aide-turned journalist George Stephanopoulos appeared in a follow up segment to talk about Emanuel, a colleague of his in the Clinton White House. He allowed that Emanuel could indeed be "abrasive at times." But he then defended his friend against charges by Republicans that Emanuel violates Obama's pledge to change Washington: "But, on the other hand, he's also built bridges with lots of Republicans, like John McCain's best friend, Senator Lindsey Graham. He had a working group in the House with Republican Congressman Ray LaHood where they would have a series of bipartisan dinners. So, there's two sides to that story."

         Of course, there was no mention of the past association of the two.

         A transcript of the November 7 Shipman segment, which aired at 7:05am:

         ROBIN ROBERTS: Now, to more on Obama's new chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. He's a Democrat with a reputation for ruffling some feathers in Washington. His abrasive style has drawn some criticism, even from himself. He once jokingly told the Chicago Tribune, quote, "I wake up some mornings hating me, too." Our senior national correspondent Claire Shipman has the story from Washington. Good morning, Claire.

         CLAIRE SHIPMAN: Good morning, Robin. That is classic Rahm Emanuel. And, yes, some Republicans are already grumbling that his temperament isn't exactly what Barack Obama promised when he talked about a more conciliatory style here. But the two men have been friends for years. Obama has told people privately he thinks Rahm's rough edges have been softened. And he can operate on Capitol Hill like nobody else. Hard-charging. In-your-face.
         CONGRESSMAN RAHM EMANUEL: They have seen jobs be shredded.
         SHIPMAN: Take no prisoners. The cliches describing Rahm Emanuel's style are stacking up fast. They may be on target, but they miss the point. More than anything, the 48-year-old Illinois representative is a pragmatic, centrist politician who likes to get things done. Clearly, Obama wants the same thing.
         JOE LOCKHART (Fmr. Clinton White House press secretary): He knows the White House. He knows how the government, the executive branch works. And he knows how the hill works. Rahm is a very strong personality. But, I think everybody, you know, whether you like him or not, people respect him, because he gets the job done.
         SHIPMAN: Emanuel was so abrasive early on in the Clinton White House, Hillary Clinton wanted him fired. But he later earned her respect as he helped to push up her husband's popularity and pushed through measures like welfare reform. He made millions later as an investment banker and then later ran for Congress in the same Chicago district where his immigrant doctor father used to make house calls. The Emanuel children were all expected to follow Benjamin's example of making good. The family joke is that only Ezekiel, a renowned oncologist, has gone into a respectable profession. But if art imitating life is at all a measure of success, Ari is a smooth-talking, A-list Hollywood agent. And the inspiration for Ari Gold in the hit TV show, "Entourage."
         ["Entourage" clip]
         SHIPMAN: And Rahm's tenacious, impassioned, sometimes abrasive style, is said to have given birth to the Josh Lyman character on "West Wing."
         ["West Wing" clip]
         SHIPMAN: Emanuel is a devout Jew and heavily focused on family. The toughest part of the decision, uprooting his family back to Washington.
         EMANUEL: I've been in the White House. I used to joke in the White House that- on Fridays I would say, "It's two more work days to Monday."
         SHIPMAN: Like all good characters, Emanuel has quirks to spare. And if you look closely, you'll see he's missing the middle finger of his right hand. He sliced it off as a teen, working at a fast food restaurant. But instead of going to the hospital, he went swimming. The wound became so infected, he almost died. He is also a former ballet dancer, talented enough have been offered a scholarship to the Joffrey Ballet. He had some high praise for his many talents last night from one former White House resident.
         SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON: Well, I think that President-elect Obama made an excellent choice. Rahm Emanuel understands both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. He understands the private sector, where he was successful for a number of years. He gets things done.
         SHIPMAN: And you can imagine, Diane, the primaries were tough for him. He had to remain very neutral between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

     

    On Friday Night, ABC & NBC Fail to Correct
    Obama's 'Seance' Gaffe

         Friday night stories on ABC's World News and the NBC Nightly News ran a clip of President-elect Barack Obama's gaffe at his press conference in which he related he had talked to all of the "living" former Presidents, as "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances." But both newscasts failed to note it was Hillary Clinton, not Nancy Reagan, who reportedly had seances in the White House. ABC's Jake Tapper called Obama's comment "a lighter moment" while NBC's Lee Cowan described it as "the only awkward moment of his first meeting with the press." FNC's Jim Angle, however, managed to point out in his 6 PM EST story: "It was actually Hillary Clinton who was reported to have engaged in seance-like sessions in which she communed with the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt."

         The AP also noted the error. "Obama slips in reference to seance by Nancy Reagan" announced the headline over a dispatch posted at 5:06 PM EST on Yahoo News. The AP's Kevin Freking recalled: "In his book, The Choice, Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward described how Clinton consulted with a spiritual adviser who led her through imaginary conversations with her personal hero, Eleanor Roosevelt. Newsweek magazine, which was promoting the book, characterized the visits as 'seances,' a term that White House officials quickly tried to squelch." Entire AP story: news.yahoo.com

         [This item, by the MRC's Brent Baker, was posted Friday night on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         Friday's CBS Evening News skipped the "seance" remark.

         From the November 7 Special Report with Brit Hume on FNC:

         JIM ANGLE: He was asked what he's been doing to get ready for office and whether he talked to any previous Presidents.
         PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA: I have spoken to all of them, that are living, obviously, President Clinton -- I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances.
         ANGLE: Nancy Reagan consulted with an astrologer about Ronald Reagan's schedule after he was shot. It was actually Hillary Clinton who was reported to have engaged in seance-like sessions in which she communed with the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt.


         # ABC's World News:

         JAKE TAPPER: Mr. Obama, in a lighter moment, said he was seeking advice from former Presidents.
         PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA: So I have spoken to all of them that are living, obviously, President Clinton -- I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances.
         TAPPER: Obama's day began with wife Michelle at parent-teacher conferences at the school of his young daughters Sasha and Malia. Perhaps the most substantive information Mr. Obama provided today was about the new puppy he's promised them...

         (Later, on Nightline, Tapper did note Obama's error and apology to Nancy Reagan.)


         # NBC Nightly News:

         LEE COWAN: And he said he's been seeking the advice of past Presidents, which provided the only awkward moment of his first meeting with the press.
         PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA: So I have spoken to all of them that are living, obviously, President Clinton -- I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about, you know, doing any seances.
         COWAN: Those lighter moments punctuated what had been a pretty casual press conference, but it was short, less than 19 minutes long, only 9 questions. He takes this weekend off, and then he heads to Washington where he has that meeting in the Oval Office with President Bush on Monday, an office that will soon be his.

     

    CBS's Smith: 'Will Obamas Return to Camelot
    in the White House?'

         Continuing the narrative of Barack Obama as John F. Kennedy, on Friday's CBS Early Show, co-host Harry Smith described how: "As the nation prepares for President-Elect Barack Obama to move into the White House, many Americans can't help but draw similarities between him and the late President John F. Kennedy." Co-host Julie Chen earlier teased the segment: "The new first family has been compared to JFK and Jackie and their young children. Can the Obamas bring that 'one brief shining moment,' that was known as Camelot, back to the White House?" Smith narrated the segment, which juxtaposed images JFK with Obama: "It was a presidency filled with idealism, glamour, and excitement...A young Senator had been elected to lead his country. Now 47 years later, America has chosen another young Senator."

         Smith went on: "And the similarities are striking. JFK was 43 when he was inaugurated. Obama is just three years older, bringing a certain youthful vigor to the White House, including, young children. Both Obama and Kennedy were criticized for lacking experience and both knew the power of well-chosen words...Kennedy had more than his share of charisma and Obama knows how to light up a room. But it's their wives who might be the real superstars. Both men overcame significant obstacles to become elected. Anti-Catholic sentiment was still widespread in the country but JFK was elected the first Roman Catholic President of the United States."

         [This item, by the MRC's Kyle Drennen, was posted Friday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         Smith concluded: "JFK was, and Obama is, someone who professes great optimism and one of the children of Camelot sees similarities." A clip of Caroline Kennedy's endorsement of Obama was played: "I have never had a candidate who inspires me the way people say that my father inspired them. But I do now! And that candidate is Barack Obama."

         Here is the full transcript of the November 7 segment:

         7:17AM TEASE:
         HARRY SMITH: Plus, will the Obamas return to Camelot in the White House?

         7:30AM TEASE:
         JULIE CHEN: The new first family has been compared to JFK and Jackie and their young children. Can the Obamas bring that 'one brief shining moment,' that was known as Camelot, back to the White House?

         7:41AM SEGMENT:
         HARRY SMITH: As the nation prepares for President-Elect Barack Obama to move into the White House, many Americans can't help but draw similarities between him and the late President John F. Kennedy. It was a presidency filled with idealism, glamour, and excitement.
         JOHN F. KENNEDY: The torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans.
         SMITH: A young Senator had been elected to lead his country. Now 47 years later, America has chosen another young Senator.
         BARACK OBAMA: Change has come to America.
         SMITH: And the similarities are striking. JFK was 43 when he was inaugurated. Obama is just three years older, bringing a certain youthful vigor to the White House, including, young children. Both Obama and Kennedy were criticized for lacking experience and both knew the power of well-chosen words.
         KENNEDY: Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.
         OBAMA: The times we were told that we can't, and the people who pressed on with that American creed, 'Yes, we can.'
         KENNEDY: I am the man who accompanied Jacqueline Kennedy to Paris and I've enjoyed it.
         SMITH: Kennedy had more than his share of charisma and Obama knows how to light up a room. But it's their wives who might be the real superstars. Both men overcame significant obstacles to become elected. Anti-Catholic sentiment was still widespread in the country but JFK was elected the first Roman Catholic President of the United States.
         KENNEDY: This nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal.
         SMITH: And perhaps even Kennedy would have been surprised that four decades after that speech, the first African-American was elected president. JFK was, and Obama is, someone who professes great optimism and one of the children of Camelot sees similarities.
         CAROLINE KENNEDY: I have never had a candidate who inspires me the way people say that my father inspired them. But I do now! And that candidate is Barack Obama.
         SMITH: This notion of Camelot, though, was never invoked during the actual presidency. It wasn't until the president had been assassinated that his widow, in an interview with Theodore White, said 'I want people to remember this one bright shining moment,' which is a line, literally, from the play itself, which happened to open in 1960.
         JULIE CHEN: Wow. Alright.
        

     

    CNN's Rick Sanchez Urges Obama to Bring
    Back FDR's WPA & CCC

         President-elect Obama's economic plans aren't left-wing and government-centered enough for CNN anchor Rick Sanchez, who about 20 minutes after Obama's Friday afternoon press conference shared his personal suggestion for another WPA (Works Progress Administration) and/or CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps), two government make-work programs from the 1930s. To a guest who lived through the Depression as a child, Sanchez proposed: "I'm thinking WPA, I'm thinking it may be time for Americans to do something like that once again because there's so many people unemployed and there's so much that needs to be done in this country."

         With another guest in the same 3:30 PM EST segment, Sanchez cited energy requirements and wondered: "Isn't this the kind of need that could be met by American workers if the government created a WPA or CCC plan?"

         [This item, by the MRC's Brent Baker, was posted Friday afternoon on the MRC's blog, NewsBusters.org: newsbusters.org ]

         Sanchez's comments:

         RICK SANCHEZ: I want to bring in John, because John's a World War II veteran which means he's old enough to remember when this country had to pull itself from its boot straps in the past. John's sitting in the middle of our everyman panel over here. You know, John, as I listen to these conversations and I read these numbers about how bad things are, I'm thinking WPA, I'm thinking it may be time for Americans to do something like that once again because there's so many people unemployed and there's so much that needs to be done in this country. Give us your own personal historical reference to this.
         JOHN GALLAGHER: I'm one who grew up during the depression and I know a great amount of frustration that people had. The WPA did a lot. The CCC did even more to give people something to do to improve their spirit and just give them a sense of purpose.
         SANCHEZ: Do you think something like that would be effective at a time like this?
         GALLAGHER: For people who don't have work to do: yes.

    ....

         SANCHEZ: Patricia Murphy joins now us as well. You know, that conversation we had moments ago about this country, you know, there's so much that we need when it comes to energy, the possibility, as Boone Pickins has mentioned, that we can go to wind, to solar. Isn't this the kind of need that could be met by American workers if the government created a WPA or CCC plan like we had as John, our World War II veteran, mentioned moment ago?

    -- Brent Baker

    November 08

    The treatment of president Bush has been a disgrace

    (What must our enemies be thinking)

    by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro

    Earlier this year, 12,000 people in San Francisco signed a petition in support of a proposition on a local ballot to rename an Oceanside sewage plant after George W. Bush. The proposition is only one example of the classless disrespect many Americans have shown the president.

    [Commentary] AP

    According to recent Gallup polls, the president's average approval rating is below 30% -- down from his 90% approval in the wake of 9/11. Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.

    This is the price Mr. Bush is paying for trying to work with both Democrats and Republicans. During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust."

    Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.

    The president's original Supreme Court choice of Harriet Miers alarmed Republicans, while his final nomination of Samuel Alito angered Democrats. His solutions to reform the immigration system alienated traditional conservatives, while his refusal to retreat in Iraq has enraged liberals who have unrealistic expectations about the challenges we face there.

    It seems that no matter what Mr. Bush does, he is blamed for everything. He remains despised by the left while continuously disappointing the right.

    Yet it should seem obvious that many of our country's current problems either existed long before Mr. Bush ever came to office, or are beyond his control. Perhaps if Americans stopped being so divisive, and congressional leaders came together to work with the president on some of these problems, he would actually have had a fighting chance of solving them.

    Like the president said in his 2004 victory speech, "We have one country, one Constitution and one future that binds us. And when we come together and work together, there is no limit to the greatness of America."

    To be sure, Mr. Bush is not completely alone. His low approval ratings put him in the good company of former Democratic President Harry S. Truman, whose own approval rating sank to 22% shortly before he left office. Despite Mr. Truman's low numbers, a 2005 Wall Street Journal poll found that he was ranked the seventh most popular president in history.

    Just as Americans have gained perspective on how challenging Truman's presidency was in the wake of World War II, our country will recognize the hardship President Bush faced these past eight years -- and how extraordinary it was that he accomplished what he did in the wake of the September 11 attacks.

    The treatment President Bush has received from this country is nothing less than a disgrace. The attacks launched against him have been cruel and slanderous, proving to the world what little character and resolve we have. The president is not to blame for all these problems. He never lost faith in America or her people, and has tried his hardest to continue leading our nation during a very difficult time.

    Our failure to stand by the one person who continued to stand by us has not gone unnoticed by our enemies. It has shown to the world how disloyal we can be when our president needed loyalty -- a shameful display of arrogance and weakness that will haunt this nation long after Mr. Bush has left the White House.

    Mr. Shapiro is an investigative reporter and lawyer who previously interned with John F. Kerry's legal team during the presidential election in 2004.

    October 29

    Talking about JohnMcCain.com - McCain-Palin 2008

     

    Quote

    JohnMcCain.com - McCain-Palin 2008

    The Truth about the McCain-Palin Health Care Plan

    Barack Obama And Joe Biden Have Consistently Lied To Americans About John McCain's Plan. Their claims have failed every fact-check - from CBS to the Washington Post. John McCain is not going to raise taxes on middle class families. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are the only ones in this race that plan to raise taxes.

    OBAMA FICTION
    John McCain Will Tax Health Care Benefits For The First Time And Will Be the Largest Middle Class Tax Increase In History.

    THE FACTS
    This Obama charge is a blatant mischaracterization of the McCain Health Plan. It only focuses on the fact that the value of the employer provided insurance will now show up as additional income for the employees – what he fails to mention – is that John McCain’s generous refundable tax credit ($5,000 for families and $2,500 for individuals) will not only shield millions of families from a tax increase but will actually give them MORE dollars to invest in their health care needs.

    The McCain Plan DOES NOT tax:

    • Premiums paid by families and individuals

    • Employers for providing health care coverage

    • Medical expenses like the cost of a procedure or medication

    • Insurance claims

    Approach Supported By Obama’s Own Advisor: This is an approach supported by Barack Obama's own Senior Economic Advisor Jason Furman who wrote that "we could scrap the current deduction altogether and replace it with progressive tax credits that, together with other changes, would ensure that every American has affordable health insurance."

    Better Than "Members of Congress":  Under the McCain Plan, your employer can provide you with health insurance  as good as a "Member of Congress" (approximately $12,000), and you would pay no  more in taxes – regardless of your tax bracket.  In fact, you would have additional money left over from the McCain tax credit to put in a health savings account.

     
    Income Tax Liability
    McCain-Palin
    Tax Credit
    Total Tax Savings
    10% Bracket
    (Up to $15,000)
    $1,200 ($12,000 x 10%) $5,000 +$3,800
    15% Bracket ($15,650 - $63,700)
    $1,800 ($12,000 x 15%) $5,000 +$3,200
    25% Bracket ($63,700 - $128,500)
    $3,000 ($12,000 x 25%) $5,000 +$2,000
    28% Bracket ($128,500 - $195,850)
    $3,360 ($12,000 x 28%) $5,000 +$1,640
    33% Bracket ($195,850 - $349,700)
    $3,960 ($12,000 x 33%) $5,000 +$1,040
    35% Bracket ($349,700 and Over)
    $4,200 ($12,000 x 35%) $5,000 +$800

    Where Is The Middle-Class "Tax Increase"?   If you or your family is in the 28% bracket, with an income of $180,000, you could receive employer provided health insurance even better than a Member of Congress, with a cost of almost $18,000, with no increase in taxes. Even the liberal leaning Tax Policy Center, agrees that the McCain proposals will result in a "net tax benefit" of more than $1,200 for an average tax payer. A recent Lewin Group study estimated savings of more than $1,400 per American family – almost three times the savings as under the Obama plan.

    OBAMA FICTION
    The McCain Plan Will Reduce Medicare Spending By Billions By “Cutting Benefits, Eligibility or Both.”

    THE FACTS
    John McCain believes that we can achieve savings in Medicare without reducing benefits or eligibility. He has proposed common-sense reforms that will not only put Medicare on a path of financial stability but ensure access to quality care for millions of Americans. Some of the policies proposed by the McCain plan include:

    • Promote payment reform that allows us to move away from the current fragmented and volume-based service to a system which rewards coordinated and quality focused care.

    • Eliminate Medicare fraud and abuse to ensure that nearly $60 billion a year, almost 10 percent of total Medicare spending, that goes to line the pocket of criminals instead of providing quality care for seniors.

    • Ensure that drug premiums for the wealthiest Americans are not being subsidized by the middle class.

    • Promote a new generation of treatment models that better manage chronic care conditions while rewarding prevention and wellness.

    • Greater use of Health IT and medical homes to promote greater co-ordination of care.

    • Reduce drug costs by allowing greater use of generics (including bio-generics).

    The Obama Spin:  If some of the proposals above sound familiar to Senator Obama’s proposals including – better managing chronic care diseases, greater use of health IT, promoting prevention and greater use of generic drugs - because they are. Only the liberal media and the Obama campaign would characterize similar proposals as “savings” in the their plan and “cutting benefits, eligibility or both” in the McCain plan.

    OBAMA FICTION
    John McCain Will Tax Health Care Benefits For The First Time And Send The Money Straight To The Insurance Companies.

    THE FACTS
    Another desperate attack by the Obama campaign. Here is what they purposefully fail to mention – the credit goes to the insurance company that the American family chooses to get coverage from, anywhere in the nation. The power of choice lies with the family – not government bureaucrats or insurance companies. 

    • Putting Families In Charge: Under the McCain Plan American families will not only decide where the tax credit should be directed for their coverage needs but any additional money left over after purchasing coverage will be controlled by the family in a portable health savings account. Ridiculing this line of strange attack, The Associated Press stated, "Of course it would, because it's meant to pay for insurance. That's like saying money for a car loan will go straight to the car dealer."

    • Obama Criticizing His Own Approach: Most importantly, Senator Obama is criticizing an approach that is used by his own HOPE credits – where tax payer money simply goes from the federal government to colleges.  

    OBAMA FICTION
    Americans With Pre-Existing Condition Under The McCain Plan Will Not Find Coverage.

    THE FACTS
    John McCain believes that no American should be denied access to quality and affordable coverage simply because of a pre-existing condition. As President, John McCain will work with governors to develop a best practice model that states can follow – a Guaranteed Access Plan or GAP – that would reflect the best experience of the states to ensure these patients have access to health coverage. There would be reasonable limits on premiums, and assistance would be available for Americans below a certain income level.

    OBAMA FICTION
    The McCain Health Plan Will Damage Employer Provided Insurance For Millions of Americans.

    THE FACTS
    The McCain health plan builds on the employer-based system. Employers will have the same incentive to provide health insurance as they do today since they will continue to deduct the cost of health insurance they provide to employees.

    • Millions With Employer Coverage Will Do Better Under The McCain Plan: Millions of American families with employer sponsored coverage in all tax brackets with the same coverage as a "Members of Congress" will now come out ahead with additional funds going into a portable health savings account. Importantly, younger and healthier employees with the McCain health care tax credit will have a bigger incentive to stay with the employers. For example, a 25-year-old employee in the 25 percent tax bracket with a $2,500 tax credit could either purchase a policy in the individual market for the same amount or stay with his employer plan and receive a $5,000 policy with an additional $1,250 to invest in a portable health savings account.  Why would people choose fewer benefits for more money?
    So Why Is Barack Obama Hiding Details About His Plan?  

    1. Barack Obama's Plan Will Harm Employer Coverage
      The Obama plan includes a $179 billion a year employer mandate.  The mandate requires employers to either provide "meaningful" coverage or pay a tax towards the government plan.  Faced with tough economic conditions and rising health costs this creates a clear incentive for employers to drop coverage and move families into the new government plan. A Lewin Group study which examined a similar employer mandate combined with a national plan, like the Obama plan, concluded that almost 52 million individuals would lose their private employer coverage. To maintain their competitive edge, others employers will follow - spelling the demise of the employer coverage system.


    2. Barack Obama's Plan Continues The Push Toward Government-Run Healthcare
      The Obama plan will create a brand new government-run health plan at the cost of $243 billion a year – a financial burden of more than $3,000 a year on American families.


    3. Barack Obama's Plan Will Damage Private Coverage
      The government-run plan will have a clear advantage over private insurance since it will be subsidized by American taxpayers. A recent analysis of both plans by the nonpartisan CATO Institute concluded that the Obama government-run plan will be able to "keep its premiums artificially low…since it can turn to the U.S. Treasury to cover any shortfalls" resulting in "undercutting the private market." According to Wall Street Journal, the goal of the Obama plan "…like HillaryCare in the 1990s, is to displace current private coverage and switch people to the default government option." 

         







       
      On The Issues

      • The Economy
      • Energy
      • Health Care
      • National Security
      • Education
      • Iraq
      • Climate Change
      • Veterans
      • Immigration
      • Values
      • Second Amendment
      • Judicial Philosophy
      • Ethics Reform
      • Natural Heritage
      • Space Program
      • National Service
      • Agricultural Policies
      • Technology
      • Fighting Crime


       

      John McCain has a remarkable record of leadership and experience that embodies his unwavering lifetime commitment to service. Read More 



      Learn More About the McCain Health Care Reform Plan. Read More

       

      Winning the Fight Against Cancer Read More



      0
       
       
       
      Paid for by McCain-Palin 2008
      Search
      Military Images and Information Do Not Imply Endorsement by DoD or Service Branch
      October 12

      AIG takes vacation at Tax Payers’ expense

       

       

       

       

      WASHINGTON — Less than a week after the federal government had to bail out American International Group Inc., the company sent executives on a $440,000 retreat to a posh California resort, lawmakers investigating the company's meltdown said Tuesday.

      The tab included $23,380 worth of spa treatments for AIG employees at the coastal St. Regis resort south of Los Angeles even as the company tapped into an $85 billion loan from the government it needed to stave off bankruptcy.

      The retreat didn't include anyone from the financial products division that nearly drove AIG under, but lawmakers were still enraged over thousands of dollars spent on catered banquets, golf outings and visits to the resort's spa and salon for executives of AIG's main U.S. life insurance subsidiary.

      "Average Americans are suffering economically. They're losing their jobs, their homes and their health insurance,(But rich overpaid politicians and fatcat CEO's dont have this problem.)" House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., scolded the company during a lengthy opening statement. "Yet less than one week after the taxpayers rescued AIG, company executives could be found wining and dining at one of the most exclusive resorts in the nation."

      The hearing disclosed that AIG executives hid the full range of its risky financial products from auditors as losses mounted, according to documents released Tuesday by a congressional panel examining the chain of events that forced the government to bail out the conglomerate.

      The panel sharply criticized AIG's former top executives, who cast blame on each other for the company's financial woes.

      "You have cost my constituents and the taxpayers of this country $85 billion and run into the ground one of the most respected insurance companies in the history of our country," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. "You were just gambling billions, possibly trillions of dollars."

      AIG, crippled by huge losses linked to mortgage defaults, was forced last month to accept the $85 billion government loan that gives the U.S. the right to an 80 percent stake in the company.

      Waxman unveiled documents showing AIG executives hid the full extent of the firm's risky financial products from auditors, both outside and inside the firm, as losses mounted.

      For instance, federal regulators at the Office of Thrift Supervision warned in March that "corporate oversight of AIG Financial Products ... lack critical elements of independence." At the same time, Pricewaterhouse Cooper confidentially warned the company that the "root cause" of its mounting problems was denying internal overseers in charge of limiting AIG's exposure access to what was going on in its highly leveraged financial products branch.

      Waxman also released testimony from former AIG auditor Joseph St. Denis, who resigned after being blocked from giving his input on how the firm estimated its liabilities.

      Three former AIG executives were summoned to appear before the hearing. One of them, Maurice "Hank" Greenberg — who ran AIG for 38 years until 2005 — canceled his appearance citing illness but submitted prepared testimony. In it, he blamed the company's financial woes on his successors, former CEOs Martin Sullivan and Robert Willumstad.

      "When I left AIG, the company operated in 130 countries and employed approximately 92,000 people," Greenberg said. "Today, the company we built up over almost four decades has been virtually destroyed."

      Sullivan and Willumstad, in turn, cast much of the blame on accounting rules that forced AIG to take tens of billions of dollars in losses stemming from exposure to toxic mortgage-related securities.

      Lawmakers also upbraided Sullivan, who ran the firm from 2005 until June of this year, for urging AIG's board of directors to waive pay guidelines to win a $5 million bonus for 2007 — even as the company lost $5 billion in the 4th quarter of that year. Sullivan countered that he was mainly concerned with helping other senior executives.

      Sullivan also came under fire for reassuring shareholders about the health of the company last December, just days after its auditor, Pricewaterhouse Cooper, warned of him that AIG was displaying "material weakness" in its huge exposure to potential losses from insuring mortgage-related securities.

      AIG's problems did not come from its traditional insurance subsidiaries, which remain healthy, but instead from its financial services operations, primarily its insurance of mortgage-backed securities and other risky debt against default. Government officials feared a panic might occur if AIG couldn't make good on its promise to cover losses on the securities; investors feared the consequences would pose a threat to the U.S. financial system, which led to the government bailout.

      AIG suffered huge losses when its credit rating was cut, thanks largely to complex financial transactions known as "credit default swaps." AIG was a major seller of the swaps, which are a form of insurance, though they are not regulated that way.

      The swap contracts promise payment to investors in mortgage bonds in the event of a default. AIG has been forced to raise billions of dollars in collateral to back up those guarantees.

      Sullivan said many of the firm's problems stemmed from "mark to market" accounting rules mandating that its positions guaranteeing troubled mortgage securities be carried as tens of billions of dollars in losses on its balance sheet.

      This in turn, said former AIG chief executive Willumstad, who ran the company for just three months after Sullivan left, forced the firm to raise billions of dollars in capital. The federal rescue came after AIG suffered disastrous liquidity problems after its credit rating was lowered, forcing the company to come up with even more capital.

      "AIG was caught in a vicious cycle," Willumstad said in the testimony.

      Greenberg said that AIG "wrote as many credit default swaps ... in the nine months following my departure as it had written in the entire previous seven years combined. Moreover, "unlike what had been true during my tenure, the majority of the credit default swaps that AIGFP wrote in the nine months after I retired were reportedly exposed to subprime mortgages."

      But Sullivan said the complex swaps had underlying value, even as the market for them froze, sending their book value plummeting and forcing AIG to scramble for collateral.

      "When the credit markets seized up, like many other financial institutions, we were forced to mark our swap positions at fire-sale prices as if we owned the underlying bonds, even though we believed that our swap positions had value if held to maturity," Sullivan said.

      The hearing is the second in two days into financial excesses and regulatory mistakes that have spooked stock and credit markets and heightened fears about a global recession.